The UK Ministry of Defence (MoD) has introduced a new social value model that requires companies bidding on multi-million-pound cyber defence contracts to commit to fighting climate change and tackling eco-inequality. This move is part of a broader trend in government procurement, where public money is being used to promote socially engineered behaviour on issues such as gender balance and climate ideology. The MoD's new requirements are significant, with key performance indicators (KPIs) that include prioritizing wellbeing and economic equality. Companies that fail to meet these KPIs risk having their contracts ripped up, being named and shamed, or disqualified from future work. This approach is at odds with the UK's national security goals, as highlighted by Alex Burghart MP, who has criticized the move as "completely unserious" and potentially compromising the country's ability to defend itself. The implications of this development are far-reaching, with potential risks to investors, regulators, communities, and the environment. The introduction of a socially engineered approach to procurement could undermine the integrity of the defence industry, while also creating unintended consequences for businesses and individuals who must comply with these new requirements. As the UK's national security goals are increasingly tied to environmental and social considerations, it remains to be seen how this approach will balance competing priorities and ensure that the country's interests are represented.